More from Mr. Joglekar’s
“vignettes”:
“Savarkar was an ardent
advocate of abolition of untouchability. It was an essential part of his
movement for Hindu solidarity. The orthodox section approved of Savarkar's
Hindu solidarity movement, but not his campaign against untouchability. The
late Mr. Davare, who was one of the leaders of the orthodox section, indicated
his dissent about it.
Savarkar argued with him
thus: "Our Hindu Sanghatan movement has just begun. We have to face three
antagonists - the Congress, the Muslims, and the British. So why begin with
differences amongst the Hindu Sanghatanists? First establish the area of
agreement. It is quite vast. Let us work with one mind in that area. A lot of
good will is achieved. We will go our separate ways when the real differences
arise. Why waste our little organized strength in playing up the differences at
the present moment?"
Once the late V. G.
Deshpande remarked about a certain prominent worker from the state of Uttar
Pradesh that he was a government man. To this Savarkar replied: 'We are so few
that our number could be counted on fingers. Why drive away people from our
fold on mere suspicion? It is no use wailing that the Congress has a horse and
we have a donkey. You will achieve nothing by it. We must use our donkey and
try to get a horse. But so long as we do not have a horse, we should not
foolishly drive away our donkey.'
There are lessons in these
instances for a person who wants to be an administrator or an organizer.”
Anurupa
No comments:
Post a Comment